ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluation of Corneal Sensitivity: Tools We Have.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noncontact Esthesiometer: Large Cohort Study on Agreement with Contact Method and Correlations with Corneal Nerves and Ocular Surface.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Current and Developing Therapeutics for Dry Eye Disease: Targeting Ion Channels.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Corneal sensitivity is an important indicator of corneal health and innervation. Corneal hypoesthesia may be an early indicator of corneal diseases such as neurotrophic keratopathy. Various instruments have been used to measure corneal sensitivity, the first being the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer. Over the years, new devices employing different stimuli have been developed, such as the gas-based Belmonte aesthesiometer, the Swiss liquid-jet aesthesiometer, and the most recently released corneal Brill aesthesiometer. In this review, the progress and advancement of aesthesiometers since their introduction is described. The mechanism, advantages, and disadvantages of these aesthesiometers are discussed and compared. We also report the relationship between corneal sensitivity and corneal innervation in various conditions, including diabetes mellitus, Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy, dry eye disease, glaucoma, keratoconus, herpes simplex keratitis, post-refractive surgery, and ocular graft-versus-host disease. Through this review, we aim to highlight the importance of the assessment of corneal sensitivity and innervation in the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of anterior and posterior segment ocular disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.