ReviewBiomedicines2025
Hydrocephalus: Molecular and Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Diagnosis and Management.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The clinical trials landscape of hydrocephalus: a scoping review of therapeutic priorities, innovation trends, and research gaps.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Comparative CT Ventricular Morphometrics in Hydrocephalus, Stroke, and Traumatic Brain Injury: A Distortion-Controlled Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Ventricular Anatomy Across CT and MRI in Hydrocephalus: A Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrocephalus is a complex neurological condition marked by abnormal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) accumulation, often leading to elevated intracranial pressure and structural brain damage. Despite advances in surgical treatment, diagnostic precision and prognosis remain challenging, especially in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). This narrative review aims to synthesize the current knowledge regarding molecular and neuroimaging biomarkers that hold diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic significance in hydrocephalus. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed studies involving congenital or acquired hydrocephalus and reporting on mechanistic, diagnostic, or monitoring biomarkers. Both established and emerging biomarkers were included, and preclinical findings were considered when translational relevance was apparent. The review highlights a broad spectrum of molecular markers including aquaporins, vascular endothelial growth factor, neurofilaments, glial fibrillary acidic protein, matrix metalloproteinases, and neuroinflammatory markers. The genetic markers associated with ciliogenesis also show promise in subtyping disease. Parallel to molecular advances, neuroimaging techniques, ranging from classic markers like Evans' index to advanced modalities such as diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), arterial spin labeling (ASL), and glymphatic MRI, provide functional perspectives on hydrocephalus diagnosis and management, while artificial intelligence may further enhance diagnostic algorithms. Molecular and imaging markers could not only increase diagnostic confidence, but also provide information on disease causes and progression. As research progresses, merging various methodologies may result in more accurate diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.