ReviewBiomedicines2025
Knee Osteoarthritis Diagnosis: Future and Perspectives.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodality imaging considerations for genicular artery embolization in knee osteoarthritis.World journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Defining the Impact of Genetics on Equine Performance and Development of Orthopaedic Disease.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Progress in research on the association between mesenchymal stem cell senescence and knee osteoarthritis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
- State-of-the-Art and Next Generation Intra-Articular Implantable Biosensors for Osteoarthritis: From Analytical Limits to Operational Stability.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Central Mechanism of Shexiang Zhuifeng Analgesic Plaster Combined with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Altered activation patterns of sensorimotor cortex during level walking and stair climbing in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Efficacy of a Modified Three-in-One Puncture Technique for Genicular Nerve Ablation in Knee Osteoarthritis.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The risk of developing symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA) during a lifetime, i.e., pain, aching, or stiffness in a joint associated with radiographic KOA, was estimated in 2008 to be around 40% in men and 47% in women. The clinical and scientific communities lack an efficient diagnostic method to effectively monitor, evaluate, and predict the evolution of KOA before and during the therapeutic protocol. In this review, we summarize the main methods that are used or seem promising for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis, with a specific focus on non- or low-invasive methods. As standard diagnostic tools, arthroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and X-ray radiography provide spatial and direct visualization of the joint. However, discrepancies between findings and patient feelings often occur, indicating a lack of correlation between current imaging methods and clinical symptoms. Alternative strategies are in development, including the analysis of biochemical markers or acoustic emission recordings. These methods have undergone deep development and propose, with non- or minimally invasive procedures, to obtain data on tissue condition. However, they present some drawbacks, such as possible interference or the lack of direct visualization of the tissue. Other original methods show strong potential in the field of KOA monitoring, such as electrical bioimpedance or near-infrared spectrometry. These methods could permit us to obtain cheap, portable, and non-invasive data on joint tissue health, while they still need strong implementation to be validated. Also, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the diagnosis seems essential to effectively develop and validate predictive models for KOA evolution, provided that a large and robust database is available. This would offer a powerful tool for researchers and clinicians to improve therapeutic strategies while permitting an anticipated adaptation of the clinical protocols, moving toward reliable and personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.