ReviewBiology2025
Biomarkers in Venous Thrombosis: Diagnostic Potential and Limitations.
Review in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammation-coagulation biomarkers predict catheter-related thrombosis following peripherally inserted central catheter placement in patients with hematologic malignancies: a retrospective cohort study.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Thromboinflammatory biomarkers and thrombotic risk in virologic failure and drug-resistant HIV: Emerging roles of d-dimer, fibrinogen, and coagulation dysregulation.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and postoperative deep vein thrombosis after tibial plateau fracture: a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Integration of ECG and Molecular Biomarkers in Pulmonary Embolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Nonlinear relationship and threshold effect of D-dimer on preoperative deep vein thrombosis in patients with ankle fractures: a retrospective study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Heat Shock Protein 47 as a Novel Predictive and Diagnostic Biomarker for Thrombosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Risk stratification of in-hospital venous thromboembolism for urological cancers: a multicenter retrospective study.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a life-threatening vascular disorder associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Prompt diagnosis is crucial for preventing fatal complications. Current clinical VTE diagnosis predominantly relies on imaging modalities such as compression ultrasound, computed tomography angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, these techniques are resource-intensive, time-consuming, and may expose patients to radiation risks. Consequently, the development of highly sensitive and specific biomarkers is imperative to enhance early detection and guide therapeutic interventions. This review examines established and emerging biomarkers in venous thrombosis, evaluates current challenges, and outlines promising future directions for biomarker research in VTE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.