Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40723423›Full record

ArticleBiology2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Coxal Bone Measurements for Sex Estimation via Machine Learning.

Diana Toneva, Silviya Nikolova, Gennady Agre, Nevena Fileva, Georgi Milenov, Dora Zlatareva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diana TonevaInstitute of Experimental Morphology, Pathology and Anthropology with Museum, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-7424-9704
Silviya NikolovaInstitute of Experimental Morphology, Pathology and Anthropology with Museum, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-5001-0707
Gennady AgreInstitute of Information and Communication Technologies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Nevena FilevaFaculty of Medicine, Medical University of Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-3120-7587
Georgi MilenovFaculty of Medicine, Medical University of Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Dora ZlatarevaFaculty of Medicine, Medical University of Sofia, 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria.

Funding

Bulgarian National Science Fund КП-06-Н51/4-11.11.2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pelvis is the most dimorphic part of the human skeleton, primarily because of its involvement in the birth process. Many sexually dimorphic traits are concentrated in the coxal bones, which form the larger part of the birth canal. The present study aimed to assess the sex differences in coxal bone size and to develop machine learning (ML) models for sex estimation based on coxal bone measurements. The sample included abdominal computed tomography scans of 276 adult Bulgarians. Three-dimensional models of the pelves were generated using InVesalius. The three-dimensional coordinates of 34 landmarks located on the right and left coxal bones were collected in MeshLab. Based on the landmark coordinates, various measurements characterizing the coxal bones were calculated. The coxal bone dimensions were tested for significant differences with respect to sex, age, and laterality. Support Vector Machines and logistic regression were employed to train models for sex estimation. The results demonstrate strong sexual dimorphism in coxal bone dimensions along with some bilateral and age-related differences. The trained ML models classify male and female bones with very high accuracy, ranging between 95% and 100%.

Indexed as

computed tomographycoxal bonemachine learningmeasurementssex

Identifiers

PMID40723423
PMCPMC12292766

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.