ReviewBiomolecules2025
The Future of Tumor Markers: Advancing Early Malignancy Detection Through Omics Technologies, Continuous Monitoring, and Personalized Reference Intervals.
Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential and pitfalls of personal reference intervals in general practice: A focus group and case vignette study among Dutch general practitioners.The European journal of general practice · 2026Article
- Human biomarker navigator.iMeta · 2026Review
- From Method-Defined Signals to Reference Measurement Procedures: Two Decades of Mass Spectrometry-Based ProGRP Quantification.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence driven protein design and sustainable nanomedicine for advanced theranostics.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Research progress of surface-enhanced Raman scattering technology in tumor liquid biopsy.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Potential of Food-Derived Rutin Phytosome Nanoparticles: Anti-Tumor, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Activity in Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing Cancer Registries: The Promise and Challenges of Integrating Molecular Markers for Enhanced Patient Care and Research.Journal of registry management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant diseases represent a major global health challenge and are among the leading causes of death worldwide. Accurate early diagnosis is essential for improving outcomes and combating these conditions effectively. Currently, the diagnosis of malignancies relies heavily on radiological imaging and pathological examinations, which are often invasive and not cost-effective. As such, there is a growing need for non-invasive and accessible methods to detect cancer in its early stages. Tumor markers-biomolecules whose levels increase in malignancy and can be measured in blood or other biological tissues and fluids-offer a promising tool. However, the sensitivity and specificity of currently available tumor markers are insufficient for early detection, limiting their use primarily to disease monitoring rather than diagnosis. While ongoing research continues to identify novel tumor markers, the development of more effective early detection strategies requires more than the discovery of new biomarkers. The continuous monitoring of patients and individuals with a high tumor risk and the personalization of tumor marker interpretation are also critical. In this review, we (i) summarize the most commonly used tumor markers, (ii) examine strategies for developing novel biomarkers, particularly through omics technologies, (iii) explore the potential of continuous monitoring using wearable biosensors for early tumor detection, and (iv) discuss approaches to personalizing tumor marker interpretation to support early diagnosis and improve treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.