Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40724135›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Hot Weather and Violence Against Women: A Global Scoping Review.

Chiratidzo Hope Mulambo, Rishu Thakur, Supriya Mathew

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chiratidzo Hope MulamboCharles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia.
Rishu ThakurRemote Health Systems and Climate Change Centre, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs, NT 0870, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-4153-5658
Supriya MathewRemote Health Systems and Climate Change Centre, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Alice Springs, NT 0870, Australia.

Funding

Central Australian Academic Health Science Network's quick response grants CAAHSNNational Health and Medical Research Council-funded Healthy Environments and Lives Network Grant No. 2008937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temperature increases due to climatic changes have been increasingly recognized as posing significant public health challenges, with wide-ranging socio-economic implications. This scoping review examines the relationship between high temperatures and violence against women (VAW) globally. Nine studies from both high-income and low- and middle-income countries were included in this review. The findings suggest an overall positive association between high temperatures and rates of VAW. Theoretical frameworks, including the temperature-aggression hypothesis and routine activity theory, offer insights into the mechanisms driving this relationship. Key risk factors such as socioeconomic status, urban heat island effects, rurality, patriarchal norms, and alcohol consumption were considered to be risk factors affecting rates of VAW. Despite growing evidence, research gaps persist, particularly in regions with high rates of VAW and in the form of qualitative studies that capture women's lived experiences. The positive associations between temperature and VAW underscore the urgency of integrating gender-sensitive strategies into climate adaptation policies to mitigate the compounding risks of climate change and gender-based violence.

Indexed as

Gender-Based ViolenceHot TemperatureViolenceClimate ChangeFemaleHumansRisk Factorsclimate changegender-based violenceheatwaveshigh temperaturesintimate partner violencepublic healthsocio-environmental stressors

Identifiers

PMID40724135
PMCPMC12295723

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.