ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Assessment of Static Balance Metrics in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Categorized Using the Fall Risk Appraisal Matrix.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of a Physio-Feedback Exercise Intervention Program on the Static Balance of Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Clustered Randomized Controlled Trial.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Fall Risk Appraisal Matrix (FRAM) is a simple fall risk assessment tool that categorizes older adults into four separate groups based on their fear of falling (FOF) and static balance performance. Static balance for the FRAM is evaluated solely by postural sway distance, which does not account for other static balance parameters, such as sway area, anterior-posterior (AP) sway range, medial-lateral (ML) sway range, and sway velocity. The objective of this study was to compare these additional metrics across the FRAM groups to assess their relevance and validity for inclusion in static balance performance assessment. Hence, these measures were compared among the four different fall risk groups within the FRAM (203 participants; mean age = 75.0 ± 7.2 years) using Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Dunn's post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction. All balance metrics were significantly greater in the Incongruent (poor balance/low FOF) and Congruent (poor balance/high FOF) groups than the Rational (good balance/low FOF) group, as well as in the Congruent group than the Irrational (good balance/high FOF) group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.