ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Clean-Label Strategies for the Replacement of Nitrite, Ascorbate, and Phosphate in Meat Products: A Review.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of Using Swiss Chard Powder as Alternative Curing Agent in Sucuk Production on the Growth ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Encapsulation Strategies for Natural Bioactives in Clean-Label Meat Preservation: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Basil as a Green Alternative to Synthetic Additives in Clean Label Gilthead Sea Bream Patties.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Probiotics and Postbiotics for Green Control of Foodborne Pathogens: Intelligent Detection and Biopreservation Strategies for Safer Foods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The clean-label movement has markedly increased consumer demand for meat products free from synthetic additives, such as sodium nitrite, ascorbate, and phosphate. This review summarizes strategies to replace these additives with natural alternatives while preserving the functional and quality properties of traditionally cured meats. Nitrite replacement commonly employs nitrate-rich vegetables, alongside nitrate-reducing starter cultures or pre-converted nitrite powders for adequate nitric oxide production and meat pigment stabilization. Ascorbate substitutes include vitamin C-rich materials and polyphenol-based antioxidants from green tea and rosemary, supporting nitrite reduction and contributing to meat pigment and oxidative stability. To compensate for phosphate functions, natural substitutes such as hydrocolloids, dietary fibers, protein isolates, and calcium powders from eggshells or oyster shells have shown partial success in restoring water-holding capacity, pH buffering, and textural integrity. In addition, non-thermal processing technologies, such as high-pressure processing, ultrasound, and cold plasma are explored as complementary strategies to enhance the efficacy of natural ingredients and support industrial scalability. However, challenges persist regarding ingredient variability, dose-dependent effects, and consistency in functional performance. Future research should focus on synergistic ingredient combinations, formulation standardization, and scalable application in industrial production to ensure the production of high-quality clean-label meat products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.