ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Impact of Salvage Radiotherapy in Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: A Review Focusing on Early-Stage, Endometrial Cancer Locoregional Relapses.
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesDefinitive radiotherapy (RT) is a frequently employed salvage option in early-stage, endometrial cancer (EC) loco-regional recurrence patients. Local control (LC) and survival rates are highly variable in the literature. The aim of this review is to assess the impact of modern salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in this group of patients.
methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed, focusing on studies that included EC local recurrence patients receiving SRT after 2000 to reflect advances in radiotherapy techniques. Our report followed the principles as outlined in the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Nine studies were included in our analysis with a total sample size of 648 patients.
conclusionsSRT offers excellent LC rates in this group of patients with minimal ≥ grade 3 toxicity. Salvage rates are limited by the presence of well-known risk factors for loco-regional relapses, with distant control being the primary mode of failure, resulting in lower survival rates. The decision to omit adjuvant RT should be weighed against the anticipated salvage outcomes in case of relapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.