Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40724878›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Machine Learning Framework for Ovarian Cancer Diagnostics Using Plasma Lipidomics and Metabolomics.

Alisa Tokareva, Mariia Iurova, Natalia Starodubtseva, Vitaliy Chagovets, Anastasia Novoselova, Evgenii Kukaev, Vladimir Frankevich, Gennady Sukhikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alisa TokarevaV.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Mariia IurovaV.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Natalia StarodubtsevaV.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6650-5915
Vitaliy ChagovetsV.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Anastasia NovoselovaV.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Evgenii KukaevV.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8397-3574
Vladimir FrankevichV.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia.
Gennady SukhikhV.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation, 117997 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 24-25-00407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer (OC), the third most common gynecologic malignancy, exhibits distinct metabolic alterations that could enable early detection via liquid biopsy. We developed an advanced machine learning pipeline integrating lipidomics (HPLC-MS, positive/negative ion modes) and NMR-based metabolomics to analyze plasma samples from 229 subjects, including 103 serous OC patients, 107 benign cases, and 19 healthy controls. By systematically evaluating feature selection methods and machine learning architectures, we identified optimal biomarker combinations for OC detection. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model based on Mann-Whitney-selected features demonstrated strong discriminatory power (81% accuracy) in distinguishing malignant from benign cases, while Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) combined with Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE) achieved exceptional performance (96% accuracy) in differentiating benign from control samples. For multiclass classification, XGBoost with Kruskal-Wallis-selected features achieved 77% accuracy, while one-versus-one CNN models utilizing Mann-Whitney-selected features attained 78% accuracy, demonstrating optimal performance among tested approaches. The complementary strengths of deep learning and ensemble methods underscore their potential for tailored diagnostic applications. While clinical implementation requires further standardization, these findings provide both a methodological framework for metabolic biomarker discovery and biological insights into OC pathophysiology, paving the way for integrated multi-omics approaches in gynecologic oncology.

Indexed as

LipidomicsMachine LearningMetabolomicsOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineBiomarkers, TumorCNNfeature selectionmachine learningmetabolomeMLPneural networkovarian tumorplasmaXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40724878
PMCPMC12294939

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.