SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Analyzing Molecular Determinants of Nanodrugs' Cytotoxic Effects.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toxicity of nanostructures in drug delivery applications.Pharmaceutical science advances · 2026Review
- Vaccine Adjuvants and Delivery Systems: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Hype vs. Health: How Approved Nanomedicines Have Met (or Missed) Early Predictions.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nanotechnology-Driven Cancer Therapies for Precision Oncology: Advances and Clinical Outlook.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Plant-derived vesicle-like nanoparticles for immunomodulation: Mechanisms and applications.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Plant-Derived Extracellular-Vesicle-Like Particles: Immune Regulation and Disease Therapy.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- The Application of Nanomaterials in Kidney Stone Disease: Emerging Strategies for Early Diagnosis, Targeted Therapy, and Prevention.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanodrugs hold great promise for targeted therapies, but their potential for cytotoxicity remains a major area of concern, threatening both patient safety and clinical translation. In this systematic review, we conducted a systematic investigation of nanotoxicity studies-identified through an AI-assisted screening procedure using Scopus, PubMed, and Elicit AI-to establish the molecular determinants of nanodrug-induced cytotoxicity. Our findings reveal three dominant and linked mechanisms that consistently act in a range of nanomaterials: oxidative stress, inflammatory signaling, and lysosomal disruption. Key nanomaterial properties like chemical structure, size, shape, surface charge, tendency to aggregate, and biocorona formation control these pathways, modulating cellular uptake, reactive oxygen species generation, cytokine release, and subcellular injury. Notably, the most frequent mechanism was oxidative stress, which often initiated downstream inflammatory and apoptotic signaling. By linking these toxicity pathways with particular nanoparticle characteristics, our review presents necessary guidelines for safer, more biocompatible nanodrug formulation design. This extensive framework acknowledges the imperative necessity for mechanistic toxicity assessment in nanopharmaceutical design and underscores the strength of AI tools in driving systematic toxicology studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.