ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arrhythmic Risk Stratification in Cardiomyopathies.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-Imaging Clinical Factors Associated With Cardiac MR Image Quality Using Large Language Model-Enabled Data Extraction.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Redefining Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: An Integrative Approach.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) has become an indispensable tool in evaluating arrhythmic risk and guiding therapeutic decisions in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathies (NICMs), including dilated (DCM), hypertrophic (HCM), and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies (ACM). Both European and American guidelines have given an additive and different value of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in specific morpho-functional (hypertrophic, dilated, and arrhythmogenic) phenotypes. In particular, LGE plays a different weight in relation to different cardiomyopathies. In dilated cardiomyopathy, LGE is able to predict arrhythmic risk in relationship to the presence and localization (septal and/or ring like LGE). On the contrary, in HCM, LGE is related to increased risk of cardiac death according to the extent (LGE >15%), while in ACM, it has a greater role in the presence of fat infiltration associated with LGE. In this review, we aim to identify predictors of sudden cardiac death related to myocardial structural features seen in CMRI in cardiomyopathies, going beyond the sole assessment of left ventricular function and ejection fraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.