ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Aortic Stenosis: Diagnosis, Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies-A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive valvular heart disease marked by a restriction of blood flow through the aortic valve, resulting in considerable morbidity and mortality if not addressed. AS has historically been managed through surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), but there is a growing trend towards the use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). TAVR has transformed the management of symptomatic severe AS and is currently authorized for patients with varying levels of surgical risk. The rising application of TAVR in patients under 65 years presents a challenge for heart valve teams (HVTs) managing younger individuals whose life expectancy may surpass the durability of the valve. Patients over 65 years are typically treated with bioprosthetic tissue valves; however, there remains significant uncertainty regarding the selection between TAVR and SAVR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.