Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40725764›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

PET and SPECT Imaging of Macrophages in the Tumor Stroma: An Update.

Shaobo Li, Alex Maes, Tijl Vermassen, Justine Maes, Chabi Sathekge, Sylvie Rottey, Christophe Van de Wiele

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shaobo LiDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Alex MaesDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, AZ Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.
Tijl VermassenDepartment of Fundamental and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1335-9966
Justine MaesDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, AZ Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.
Chabi SathekgeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, AZ Groeninge, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.
Sylvie RotteyDepartment of Fundamental and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Christophe Van de WieleDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are pivotal immune cells within the tumor stroma, whose dynamic alterations significantly impact tumor progression and therapeutic responses. Conventional methods for TAM detection, such as biopsy, are invasive and incapable of whole-body dynamic monitoring. In contrast, positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) offer a non-invasive imaging approach by targeting TAM-specific biomarkers like CD206, TSPO, and CCR2. This review comprehensively summarizes the advancements in TAM-targeted imaging probes, including cell surface markers, metabolic/functional markers, and multifunctional nanoprobe, while assessing their potential in tumor immune surveillance and tumor targeting therapeutic applications. While current probes, including

Indexed as

macrophagesPET and SPECTtumor stroma

Identifiers

PMID40725764
PMCPMC12294810

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.