ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Management of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: An Integrative Approach.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiota-Inflammation Crosstalk in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: MPN-Specific Human Data, Mechanistic Plausibility and Translational Priorities.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Characterization of JAK2V617F and the JAK2 46/1 germline haplotype in myeloproliferative neoplasms in a Saudi Arabian cohort: a case-based analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are chronic blood cancers characterized by overproduction of blood cells, leading to increased thrombotic and ischemic risk. Patients frequently experience symptoms including fatigue, abdominal discomfort, and complications from thrombotic events, which significantly impact the quality of life (QoL). Many patients inquire about complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) approaches, including nutritional interventions and supplements, creating opportunities for healthcare providers to engage in meaningful discussions guided by the principle of safety. This review examines the current evidence for integrative approaches in MPN management, focusing on nutrition, microbiota, supplements, mind-body techniques, and acupuncture. We analyze the available data on anti-inflammatory interventions, QoL improvement strategies, and treatment tolerance enhancement. The review provides clinicians with evidence-based guidance for safely integrating complementary therapeutic approaches with conventional MPN treatment. This integrative approach represents an opportunity to develop more comprehensive and personalized therapeutic paradigms in hematology while ensuring that complementary interventions serve as adjuncts to evidence-based medical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.