ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025
Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis-Current Understanding and Open Questions.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reported complications after spinopelvic fixation for U-type sacral fractures in older adults: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Pooled it
- Fragility fractures of the pelvis in the elderly: protocol for an international prospective multicentre observational cohort study.BMJ open · 2026Observational
- Artificial Intelligence in Pelvic Fracture Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Review
- Parathyroid Hormone in the Management of Pelvic Fragility Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Impact of CT Imaging on the Diagnosis of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: An Observational Prospective Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the necessity of edema-sensitive imaging in assessing fragility fractures of the pelvis: a retrospective cohort study utilizing the OF Pelvis Classification and Score.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) are common in elderly patients, particularly those with osteoporosis. FFPs can be associated with high mortality, morbidity, and functional decline. Known risk factors include being over 80 years old and delays in surgical intervention when this is required. While the role of surgery in FFPs remains less defined than in proximal femoral fractures in the elderly, studies indicate that surgical fixation offers improved survival and functional outcomes. Similarly, the choice of fixation method, whether posterior or anterior, and their combinations, vary between clinicians. It depends on the fracture type and patient-specific factors, such as bone quality and comorbidities, as well as the surgeon's experience and the availability of resources. Additionally, orthobiologic adjuncts such as cement augmentation and sacroplasty can enhance the stability of an osteoporotic fracture during surgical intervention. Furthermore, medical treatments for osteoporosis, especially the use of teriparatide, have demonstrated beneficial effects in reducing fractures and promoting healing of the FFPs. Return to pre-injury activities is often limited, with independence rates remaining low at mid-term follow-up. Factors that influence clinical outcomes include fracture type, with Type III and IV fractures generally leading to poorer outcomes, and patient age, functional reserve, and comorbidities. The present tutorial aims to summarise the relevant evidence on all aspects of FFPs, inform an updated management strategy, and provide a template of the reconstruction ladder referring to the most available surgical techniques and treatment methods. Further research, based on large-scale studies, is needed to address the open questions described in this manuscript and refine surgical techniques, as well as determine optimal treatment pathways for this vulnerable patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.