ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
The Implications of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Coeliac Disease.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
T1D and CD commonly occur together. This association has received increasing attention from researchers and is considered in detail in this review. Since CD is over-represented in T1D, it may cause ill health with attendant complications, but because there is an effective dietary treatment, screening has been recommended in children and adults. However, there are many unknowns regarding this association, and understanding the why, when, and how with regard to screening and managing those with dual diagnoses requires thorough consideration when introducing the concept of screening to patients. It is important that patients and, where appropriate, carers are put at the heart of the decision-making process with careful discussion of the issues involved before undertaking screening that might uncover a second life-changing diagnosis, for which, without preparatory preparation and support, individuals may be ill-prepared, causing mental health issues. For some patients, an initial policy of monitoring rather than moving to immediate small bowel biopsy and exposure to a gluten-free diet (GFD) will be appropriate. The correct management of patients will ultimately improve their quality of life medically and socially.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.