Trial reportTherapeutics and clinical risk management2025
Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation Applied During the Post-Anesthesia Recovery Period in Improving Postoperative Recovery Quality After Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on recovery following gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of acupressure combined with flexible pressure sensor manometry on anesthesia recovery in patients undergoing Bronchoalveolar lavage: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Article
- Effectiveness of electrical stimulation for postoperative rehabilitation of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Clinical Significance of Postoperative Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation [Response to Letter].Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
- Determining Effect of Postoperative Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on Recovery Quality After Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery [Letter].Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological intervention to enhance postoperative recovery. However, its application during the post-anesthesia recovery period remains underexplored. This study investigated the impact of TEAS during the post-anesthesia recovery period on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Patients and Methods: In this single-center, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery were randomly allocated to receive either TEAS or sham stimulation at bilateral Hegu (LI4), Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), and Sanyinjiao (SP6) acupoints for 30 minutes during the post-anesthesia recovery period in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score assessed on postoperative days (POD) 1, 2, and 3. Secondary outcomes included pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), recovery times, and adverse events. Results: Ninety-seven patients completed the study, with 48 in the TEAS group and 49 in the Sham group. The TEAS group exhibited significantly higher QoR-15 scores on POD 1 compared to the Sham group, with improvements in emotional state, physical comfort, and pain dimensions. On POD 2, the TEAS group had significantly higher pain dimension scores. The TEAS group also reported lower resting VAS scores on POD 1 and lower exercise VAS scores on POD 1 and 2. The incidence of PONV was lower on POD 1, with fewer patients requiring rescue antiemetics. Additionally, the TEAS group experienced shorter times to first flatus and ambulation. Adverse events were comparable between the groups, with no local skin irritation noted in the TEAS group. Conclusion: TEAS applied during the post-anesthesia recovery period significantly improves early postoperative recovery quality, reduces pain and PONV, and accelerates functional recovery in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.