Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726729›Full record

Trial reportTherapeutics and clinical risk management2025

Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation Applied During the Post-Anesthesia Recovery Period in Improving Postoperative Recovery Quality After Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Zhihu Zhou, Xiang Yang, Min Shi, Liqiao Huang, Danping Wu, Huailong Yang, Xu Zhang

Abstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhihu Zhou *Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-5218-0597
Xiang Yang *Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China.
Min ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0008-3403-1979
Liqiao HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China.
Danping WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China.
Huailong YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China.
Xu ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-8938-2085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological intervention to enhance postoperative recovery. However, its application during the post-anesthesia recovery period remains underexplored. This study investigated the impact of TEAS during the post-anesthesia recovery period on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Patients and Methods: In this single-center, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery were randomly allocated to receive either TEAS or sham stimulation at bilateral Hegu (LI4), Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), and Sanyinjiao (SP6) acupoints for 30 minutes during the post-anesthesia recovery period in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score assessed on postoperative days (POD) 1, 2, and 3. Secondary outcomes included pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), recovery times, and adverse events. Results: Ninety-seven patients completed the study, with 48 in the TEAS group and 49 in the Sham group. The TEAS group exhibited significantly higher QoR-15 scores on POD 1 compared to the Sham group, with improvements in emotional state, physical comfort, and pain dimensions. On POD 2, the TEAS group had significantly higher pain dimension scores. The TEAS group also reported lower resting VAS scores on POD 1 and lower exercise VAS scores on POD 1 and 2. The incidence of PONV was lower on POD 1, with fewer patients requiring rescue antiemetics. Additionally, the TEAS group experienced shorter times to first flatus and ambulation. Adverse events were comparable between the groups, with no local skin irritation noted in the TEAS group. Conclusion: TEAS applied during the post-anesthesia recovery period significantly improves early postoperative recovery quality, reduces pain and PONV, and accelerates functional recovery in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

Indexed as

gynecological laparoscopic surgerypost-anesthesia recovery periodpostoperative recovery qualityQoR-15TEAS

Identifiers

PMID40726729
PMCPMC12302977

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.