ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2025
Early intensive therapy for preventing neurological deterioration in branch atheromatous disease.
Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04824911 (Early Intensive Medical Therapy for the Prevention of Early Neurological Deterioration in Branch Atheromatous Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Early Intensive Medical Therapy for the Prevention of Early Neurological Deterioration in Branch Atheromatous Disease
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Branch Atheromatous Disease (BAD)-Related Stroke: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- High-Resolution Vessel Wall Imaging Can Differentiate Between Branch Atheromatous Disease From Small Vessel Ischemic Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Predicting early neurological deterioration in acute branch atheromatous disease without reperfusion therapy: a machine learning model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- A multimodal deep learning model for predicting early neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Branch atheromatous disease (BAD) is a subtype of ischemic stroke associated with early neurological deterioration (END) and poor outcomes. Although BAD shares features with large artery atherosclerosis, optimal treatment strategies remain undefined. Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of early dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and high-intensity statins in reducing END and improving outcomes in BAD. Design: A prospective, single-arm study with a historical control group. Methods: This study reports the results of the Statin and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Preventing Early Neurological Deterioration in Branch Atheromatous Disease trial. Patients with BAD-related ischemic stroke were treated with aspirin, clopidogrel, and high-intensity statins within 24 h of symptom onset. Outcomes were compared with a historical control cohort treated with single antiplatelet therapy and moderate- or low-intensity statins. The primary outcome was the composite of END (defined as an National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score increase ⩾2 points within 7 days) or recurrent stroke within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included severe END, functional outcomes at 90 days, and safety events. Results: A total of 91 patients received intensive therapy and 285 received standard treatment. The primary endpoint occurred less frequently in the intensive group (34.1% vs 48.1%; adjusted risk ratio (aRR), 0.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.98; Conclusion: Early intensive therapy with DAPT and high-intensity statins significantly reduced END and improved recovery in BAD without compromising safety. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT04824911 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04824911).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.