Evidence mapPaperPMID 40726768Full record

ReviewPatient preference and adherence2025

Effectiveness of Pharmacist-Led Intervention on Medication Adherence in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Lubna Farhana, Fima Perdani Rahayu, Shofuro Sholihah, Waleed Sweileh, Rizky Abdulah, Sofa D Alfian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lubna FarhanaDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia.ORCID 0009-0005-2836-0969
Fima Perdani RahayuDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia.
Shofuro SholihahDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia.
Waleed SweilehDepartment of Physiology, Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.ORCID 0000-0002-9460-5144
Rizky AbdulahDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia.
Sofa D AlfianDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-5419-8938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Managing chronic diseases often requires long-term treatment to prevent complications. However, the effectiveness of treatment is often reduced due to poor medication adherence. Poor medication adherence has been associated with 1.1 million hospital days in France and contributes to 200,000 premature deaths in Europe. As primary providers of pharmaceutical care, pharmacists have implemented various intervention strategies to address the problem. Therefore, this study aims to systematically examine the effectiveness of pharmacist-led interventions in improving medication adherence among patients with chronic diseases. Methods: Literature search was conducted using 2 databases (PubMed and EBSCO), focusing on RCTs published until October 2024. These RCTs analyzed the impact of pharmacist-led interventions on medication adherence in chronic diseases, such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, asthma, cardiovascular disease, and COPD. Studies on multiple chronic, acute, or mental conditions were excluded. The Risk of Bias 2 tool (RoB2) was used to assess the quality of the studies. Results: Among 75 studies, a total of 26 were included, with the majority conducted in Europe (42%). In addition, 4 types of interventions were identified, including counseling (53.8%), tailored (26.9%), technology-based monitoring (3.85%), and multiple interventions (15.4%). A total of 18 studies (69.2%) demonstrated a significant association between pharmacist-led interventions and medication adherence. The majority measured adherence using self-reported questionnaires. Bias assessment results showed that 7 studies had low risk of bias, 10 had high risk, and 9 had some concerns. Conclusion: Pharmacist-led interventions, such as counseling, tailored, and multiple interventions, can improve medication adherence in chronic diseases. Although pharmacist-led interventions show promising potential, their effectiveness varies depending on the type of intervention and adherence measurements. Further studies are needed to focus on tailored interventions that address patient-specific barriers, ensuring higher efficiency in time, resources, and costs.

Indexed as

chronic diseasesmedication adherencepharmacist-led interventionpublic healthrandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID40726768
PMCPMC12301242

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.