Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40726912›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Multipronged biobehavioural intervention strategies for prevention and control of hypertension: A protocol for systematic review of education-based community trials.

Martins Nweke, Nalini Govender, Innocent Nweke, Julian Pillay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martins NwekeGlobal Health and Sustainability, Faculty of Health Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.
Nalini GovenderBasic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.
Innocent NwekeDepartment of Sociology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Julian PillayGlobal Health and Sustainability, Faculty of Health Sciences, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension is one of the most pressing health challenges in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly South Africa. Evaluation of community-wide biobehavioural, preventative and control strategies for hypertension are necessary for planning and advancing primary prevention in the region. This systematic review aims to assess community-wide biobehavioural intervention strategies for hypertension prevention and control worldwide. This protocol follows the preferred items for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P). Databases: Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Academic Search Complete, Cumulative Index for Allied Health Literature and African Journals (SABINET). Two independent reviewers will conduct article screening and data extraction. Primary data items include multipronged bio-behavioural interventions used for community-wide prevention and control of hypertension, intervention efficacy, and roles of forms and format, modes, and channels of intervention on efficacy. Methodological quality will be assessed using the mixed-method appraisal tool. Findings will be presented using narrative synthesis. Descriptive data will be summarized using frequencies and percentages. Using random-effect meta-analysis, efficacy of interventions will be evaluated. Heterogeneity will be examined using the Cochrane I

Indexed as

Community-wideControlEducationHypertensionInterventionMultiprongedPrevention

Identifiers

PMID40726912
PMCPMC12302144

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.