ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2025
A Comparison of the Lateral Approach (Paramedian) Versus the Modified Lateral Approach (Modified Paramedian) in Spinal Anesthesia: Evaluating Ease of Procedure and Patient Satisfaction in Urological Surgeries; A Triple-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is preferred over general anesthesia for lower extremity surgeries, but the optimal method of needle placement is debated. Although the paramedian approach reduces the risks of dural puncture, it presents technical difficulties. The modified paramedian technique may increase safety and patient satisfaction by facilitating subarachnoid access and overcoming anatomical challenges, particularly in obese or elderly patients. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the paramedian and modified paramedian techniques from the perspective of anesthesiologists and their impact on postoperative patient satisfaction. Methods: This triple-blind randomized clinical trial investigated the effects of two SA techniques - paramedian and modified paramedian - on patient satisfaction and procedural ease. A total of 112 patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled. Data were collected using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Care Questionnaire. Demographic information was recorded in coded form, and data analysis was performed using SPSS version 19. Statistical methods included the independent Results: The results indicated that the modified paramedian group demonstrated superior performance in terms of success on the first attempt (P = 0.006), reduced need for repositioning (P = 0.038), and fewer repeated attempts (P = 0.017). Additionally, patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the modified paramedian group (P = 0.001). Multivariate regression confirmed age and Body Mass Index (BMI) as independent predictors of procedural difficulty (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The modified paramedian technique significantly enhanced the ease of SA administration and patient satisfaction compared to the traditional approach. These findings indicate its potential to improve the anesthesia process, reduce side effects, and elevate patient experience. This study supports broader adoption of the technique in surgical and healthcare settings, advancing anesthesia care quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.