ArticleJournal of blood medicine2025
The Value of Using Bedside Point of Care Testing for International Normalized Ratio in Patients on Warfarin Undergoing Dental Procedures and Bleeding Assessment; A Single Center Prospective Study.
Article in Journal of blood medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Local Hemostasis as the Critical Enabler for Safe Antithrombotic Therapy in Dentistry-Navigating Future Frontiers and Innovative Concepts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Postoperative bleeding is a significant complication in dental surgeries, especially for patients on anticoagulants. Risk stratification based on patient factors can help reduce these complications, but current tools lack accurate risk prediction. Aim: To examine point-of-care device accuracy for measuring International Normalized Ratio (INR) compared to laboratory INR and evaluate risk factors for post-dental surgical bleeding in warfarin patients. Methods: The primary outcome was post-operative bleeding following invasive dental procedures. INR measurements were performed using both point-of-care devices and laboratory methods. One-way ANOVA compared INR values across bleeding severity groups and procedure types. Independent samples Results: The study included 88 patients (61.4% female, mean age 49.7 ± 14.1 years). Bleeding outcomes were: no bleeding (33.0%, n = 29), minimal bleeding (34.1%, n = 30), moderate bleeding (20.5%, n = 18), and severe bleeding (11.4%, n = 10). No significant differences existed between <5 mg versus ≥5 mg warfarin groups in point-of-care INR (2.51 vs 2.70, p = 0.235) or laboratory INR (2.54 vs 2.63, p = 0.572). Significant associations were found between physician and procedure type (p < 0.001) and between point-of-care and laboratory INR measurements (r = 0.717, p < 0.001). No correlation existed between INR level and bleeding. Conclusion: Bleeding risk in warfarin patients undergoing dental procedures depends on procedure complexity and duration rather than INR level alone. Point-of-care INR devices demonstrated accuracy comparable to laboratory measurements, offering valuable risk assessment that may help predict bleeding risk and provide reassurance for low-risk cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.