Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40728099›Full record

SynthesisThe New phytologist2025

A critical reassessment of the novel weapons hypothesis and allelopathy as an adaptive strategy that facilitates plant invasion.

Robert I Colautti, Pedro Madeira Antunes

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert I ColauttiBiology Department, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4213-0711
Pedro Madeira AntunesDepartment of Biology, Algoma University, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, P6A 2G4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3596-6983

Funding

Canada Research ChairsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2023-04103Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2023-05811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants have evolved an assortment of chemical adaptations that integrate environmental cues with developmental processes to regulate growth and reproduction. A subset of these phytochemicals may be considered allelopathic adaptations if they enhance fitness by suppressing competition for limiting resources. Despite compelling critiques by John Harper almost a half century ago, research on allelopathy nonetheless experienced a revival at the turn of the 21

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAllelopathyIntroduced SpeciesModels, BiologicalPlantsBiological Evolutionbiological invasionseco‐evolutionary feedbackKoch postulatesphytochemistryplant competitionplant–microbe dynamics

Identifiers

PMID40728099
PMCPMC12445827

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.