ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
A Benchmarking Platform for Assessing Protein Language Models on Function-Related Prediction Tasks.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding viral protein sequences by large language models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Heavy-chain immune repertoire sequencing enables language-model prediction of antigen-specific antibodies.Research square · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteins play a crucial role in almost all biological processes, serving as the building blocks of life and mediating various cellular functions, from enzymatic reactions to immune responses. Accurate annotation of protein functions is essential for advancing our understanding of biological systems and developing innovative biotechnological applications and therapeutic strategies. To predict protein function, researchers primarily rely on classical homology-based methods, which use evolutionary relationships, and increasingly on machine learning (ML) approaches. Lately, protein language models (PLMs) have gained prominence; these models leverage specialized deep learning architectures to effectively capture intricate relationships between sequence, structure, and function. We recently conducted a comprehensive benchmarking study to evaluate diverse protein representations (i.e., classical approaches and PLMs) and discuss their trade-offs. The current work introduces the Protein Representation Benchmark-PROBE tool, a benchmarking framework designed to evaluate protein representations on function-related prediction tasks. Here, we provide a detailed protocol for running the framework via the GitHub repository and accessing our newly developed user-friendly web service. PROBE encompasses four core tasks: semantic similarity inference, ontology-based function prediction, drug target family classification, and protein-protein binding affinity estimation. We demonstrate PROBE's usage through a new use case evaluating ESM2 and three recent multimodal PLMs-ESM3, ProstT5, and SaProt-highlighting their ability to integrate diverse data types, including sequence and structural information. This study underscores the potential of protein language models in advancing protein function prediction and serves as a valuable tool for both PLM developers and users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40728618What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.