Evidence mapPaperPMID 40728739Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2025

[Schizophrenia and catatonia: from ICD-10 to ICD-11. German version].

T Nickl-Jockschat, J Steiner, D Hirjak, A Hasan

Abstract readHistorical ArticleEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T Nickl-JockschatUniversitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland. thomas.nickl-jockschat@med.ovgu.de.
J SteinerUniversitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsmedizin Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
D HirjakKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland.
A HasanKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classification of psychotic disorders has undergone a variety of changes. Since Karl Ludwig Kahlbaum's (Kahlbaum 1874) first descriptions of catatonic states and Emil Kraepelin's (Kraepelin 1883) nosological classification of psychotic syndromes in the second half of the nineteenth century, the diagnostic criteria for these disorders have been repeatedly modified, significantly impacting clinical practice. Eugen Bleuler (Bleuler 1911) coined the term "schizophrenia", emphasizing the disturbances in thinking, feeling and acting that he had observed. With the introduction of the 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), several significant changes to the diagnostic criteria were introduced. First-line symptoms according to Schneider lost importance. The subtypes (e.g., paranoid, hebephrenic and catatonic schizophrenia) were also omitted and symptom and progression classifiers have been introduced instead. Finally, catatonia is now defined as an independent diagnostic entity, while in ICD-10 it was still assigned to schizophrenia under the code F20.2. This recognizes catatonia's independent, cross-diagnostic nature. Due to these symptom and progression classifiers, the ICD-11 now takes a more a hybrid categorical and dimensional approach to the diagnosis than the previous version.

Indexed as

CatatoniaInternational Classification of DiseasesSchizophreniaGermanyHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansCategorical-dimensional modelClassificationDiagnostic criteriaPsychomotor symptomsPsychosis

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.