ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
DNFE: Directed network flow entropy for detecting tipping points during biological processes.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- scTIDE: Deciphering Critical Transitions Through Cell-Perturbed Manifold Graphs and Optimal Transport Conditional Flow Matching.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- HNPP: Higher-order network-based personalized PageRank for detecting critical phase in complex biological systems.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- CDNFE suggests FNDC3B and NECTIN4 as drivers of precancer progression via PI3K/AKT EMT.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Detecting the Pre-Disease State of Single Sample Through the Change in Local Network Enrichment Level.Genes · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Future of Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis: The Transformative Role of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Culture-Negative Cases.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Typically, in dynamic biological processes, there is a critical state or tipping point that marks the transition from one stable state to another, surpassing which a considerable qualitative shift takes place. Identifying this tipping point and its driving network is essential to avert or delay disastrous outcomes. However, most traditional approaches built upon undirected networks still suffer from a lack of robustness and effectiveness when implemented based on high-dimensional small-sample data, especially for single-cell data. To address this challenge, we develop a directed network flow entropy (DNFE) method, which can transform measured omics data into a directed network. This method is applicable to both single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk data. Applying this algorithm to six real datasets, including three single-cell datasets, two bulk tumor datasets, and a blood dataset, the method is proved to be effective not only in identifying critical states, as well as their dynamic network biomarkers, but also in helping explore regulatory relationships between genes. Numerical simulation results demonstrate that the DNFE algorithm is robust across various noise levels and outperforms existing methods in detecting tipping points. Furthermore, the numerical simulations for 100-node and 1000-node gene regulatory networks illustrate the method's application for large-scale data. The DNFE method predicts active transcription factors, and further identified "dark genes", which are usually overlooked with traditional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.