ArticleCell proliferation2026
Evolutionary Analysis of Transcriptional Regulation Mediated by Cdx2 in Rodents.
Article in Cell proliferation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary Analysis of Transcriptional Regulation Mediated by Cdx2 in Rodents.Cell proliferation · 2026Article
- Systematic Analysis of Monoallelic Gene Expression and Chromatin Accessibility Across Multiple Tissues in Hybrid Mice.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Differences in gene expression, which arise from divergence in cis-regulatory elements or alterations in transcription factors (TFs) binding specificity, are one of the most important causes of phenotypic diversity during evolution. On one hand, changes in the cis-elements located in the vicinity of target genes affect TF binding and/or local chromatin environment, thereby modulating gene expression in cis. On the other hand, alterations in trans-factors influence the expression of their target genes in a more pleiotropic fashion. Although the evolution of amino acid sequences is much slower than that of non-coding regulatory elements, particularly for the TF DNA binding domains (DBDs), it is still possible that changes in TF-DBD might have the potential to drive large phenotypic changes if the resulting effects have a net positive effect on the organism's fitness. If so, species-specific changes in TF-DBD might be positively selected. So far, however, this possibility has been largely unexplored. By protein sequence analysis, we observed high sequence conservation in the DBD of the TF caudal-type homeobox 2 across many vertebrates, whereas three amino acid changes were exclusively found in mouse Cdx2 (mCdx2), suggesting potential positive selection in the mouse lineage. Multi-omics analyses were then carried out to investigate the effects of these changes. Surprisingly, there were no significant functional differences between mCdx2 and its rat homologue (rCdx2), and none of the three amino acid changes had any impact on its function. Finally, we used rat-mouse allodiploid embryonic stem cells to study the cis effects of Cdx2-mediated gene regulation between the two rodents. Interestingly, whereas Cdx2 binding is largely divergent between mouse and rat, the transcriptional effect induced by Cdx2 is conserved to a much larger extent. There were no significant functional differences between mCdx2 and its rat homologue (rCdx2), and none of the three amino acid changes had any impact on its function. Moreover, Cdx2 binding is largely divergent between mouse and rat; the transcriptional effect induced by Cdx2 is conserved to a much larger extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.