Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40729530›Full record

ArticleCell proliferation2026

Evolutionary Analysis of Transcriptional Regulation Mediated by Cdx2 in Rodents.

Weizheng Liang, Guipeng Li, Yukai Wang, Wencheng Wei, Rui Chen, Siyue Sun, Diwen Gan, Hongyang Yi, Bernhard Schaefke, Yuhui Hu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell proliferation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Weizheng LiangHebei Key Laboratory of Systems Biology and Gene Regulation, Central Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, Hebei, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7274-6034
Guipeng LiShenzhen Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Yukai WangKey Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0524-6865
Wencheng WeiShenzhen Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Rui ChenShenzhen Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3821-0436
Siyue SunShenzhen Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Diwen GanShenzhen Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0185-4131
Hongyang YiShenzhen Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Bernhard SchaefkeShenzhen Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Yuhui HuShenzhen Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Qi ZhouKey Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6549-9362
Wei LiKey Laboratory of Organ Regeneration and Reconstruction, State Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7864-404X
Huanhuan CuiShenzhen Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Wei ChenShenzhen Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFF1201000National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFC3400400Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Systems Biology ZDSYS20200811144002008Shenzhen Science and Technology Program KQTD20180411143432337Zhangjiakou City Key R&D Plan Project 2322088D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences in gene expression, which arise from divergence in cis-regulatory elements or alterations in transcription factors (TFs) binding specificity, are one of the most important causes of phenotypic diversity during evolution. On one hand, changes in the cis-elements located in the vicinity of target genes affect TF binding and/or local chromatin environment, thereby modulating gene expression in cis. On the other hand, alterations in trans-factors influence the expression of their target genes in a more pleiotropic fashion. Although the evolution of amino acid sequences is much slower than that of non-coding regulatory elements, particularly for the TF DNA binding domains (DBDs), it is still possible that changes in TF-DBD might have the potential to drive large phenotypic changes if the resulting effects have a net positive effect on the organism's fitness. If so, species-specific changes in TF-DBD might be positively selected. So far, however, this possibility has been largely unexplored. By protein sequence analysis, we observed high sequence conservation in the DBD of the TF caudal-type homeobox 2 across many vertebrates, whereas three amino acid changes were exclusively found in mouse Cdx2 (mCdx2), suggesting potential positive selection in the mouse lineage. Multi-omics analyses were then carried out to investigate the effects of these changes. Surprisingly, there were no significant functional differences between mCdx2 and its rat homologue (rCdx2), and none of the three amino acid changes had any impact on its function. Finally, we used rat-mouse allodiploid embryonic stem cells to study the cis effects of Cdx2-mediated gene regulation between the two rodents. Interestingly, whereas Cdx2 binding is largely divergent between mouse and rat, the transcriptional effect induced by Cdx2 is conserved to a much larger extent. There were no significant functional differences between mCdx2 and its rat homologue (rCdx2), and none of the three amino acid changes had any impact on its function. Moreover, Cdx2 binding is largely divergent between mouse and rat; the transcriptional effect induced by Cdx2 is conserved to a much larger extent.

Indexed as

CDX2 Transcription FactorEvolution, MolecularGene Expression RegulationAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsHumansMiceRatsTranscription FactorsCdx2 protein, mouseCDX2 Transcription FactorTranscription FactorsCdx2cis and transevolutiongene regulationmouse‐rat allodiploid fusion cells

Identifiers

PMID40729530
PMCPMC12961547

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.