Trial reportClinical obesity2026
Association of the Early Response to an Oral Shape-Shifting Superabsorbent Hydrogel Capsule With Weight Loss.
Trial report in Clinical obesity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of the Early Response to an Oral Shape-Shifting Superabsorbent Hydrogel Capsule With Weight Loss.Clinical obesity · 2026Trial
- Quality of life improvements associated with weight loss using a novel shape-shifting hydrogel capsule: RESET study results.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Trial
- The safety and efficacy of extended use of an oral shape-shifting superabsorbent hydrogel capsule for weight loss: The ELECT extension study.Obesity pillars · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early response (ER) to treatment is predictive of longer-term weight loss. In this post hoc analysis, ER to an oral shape-shifting superabsorbent hydrogel capsule (Epitomee) combined with a lifestyle intervention was compared to placebo combined with a lifestyle intervention. Participants (age = 48.5 ± 12.5 and 48.6 ± 12.4; BMI = 34.1 ± 3.3 and 33.7 ± 3.4, in the Epitomee and placebo groups, respectively) were randomised to Epitomee (N = 138) or placebo (N = 141) with lifestyle intervention. Analyses included body weight measurements taken at baseline, week 8, and week 24. Of the 279 participants enrolled in the study, 250 (90% of the ITT population) provided weight data, including 124 participants in the Epitomee group and 126 in the placebo group. Participants with missing weight data at week 24 were classified as non-responders. Early response (ER) was defined as a weight loss of ≥ 2% at week 8. Weight loss at week 24 was greater in ER to Epitomee compared to placebo (9.3% ± 6.0% vs. 6.9% ± 4.3%; p < 0.0001). The odds ratio for ER to achieve > 5% weight loss at week 24 was 4.10 (95% CI: 1.02, 16.46) for Epitomee and 2.38 (95% CI: 0.62, 9.21) for placebo. A greater proportion of ER to Epitomee, compared to placebo, achieved > 5% (76% vs. 62%; p = 0.0472), ≥ 7% (61% vs. 38%; p < 0.0045) and ≥ 10% (39% vs. 17%; p < 0.0025) weight loss at week 24. ER response to Epitomee was associated with greater weight loss at 24 weeks compared to placebo. Monitoring ER to Epitomee and titrating treatment based on ER may enhance weight loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.