ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2026
Intranasal delivery route for neurodegenerative diseases: recent insights and future directions.
Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The cribriform plate: A dynamic central nervous system-immune hub.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Intranasal Biodegradable Nanomedicine for Epilepsy Management: Targeting the Brain Beyond the Blood-Brain Barrier.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Editorial: New approaches to overcome the blood-brain barrier for the treatment of CNS disorders.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases are increasingly significant causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide, particularly among the elderly. Despite their widespread prevalence, effective treatment options remain inadequate. A significant challenge contributing to this therapeutic gap is the impermeability of the blood-brain barrier to many drugs. Thus, developing new strategies to bypass this barrier and deliver therapeutic agents to the central nervous system (CNS) is crucial. The intranasal (IN) route has emerged as a promising approach in animal models of neurodegenerative diseases. This method of administration is gaining attention as a viable alternative for delivering various pharmacological agents, including proteins, miRNA, and oligonucleotides, to the CNS. It offers advantages over oral and intravenous routes. However, translating IN formulations from preclinical models to clinical practice presents several challenges. Assessing the adequacy of current clinical trials in evaluating IN delivery efficacy is crucial. Furthermore, the introduction of novel formulations such as nanoparticles sparks excitement for enhancing the effectiveness of IN drug administration compared to traditional free drug solutions. This review summarizes recent advancements in delivering therapeutic molecules to the CNS to treat neurodegenerative diseases. We explore critical strategies to overcome the blood-brain barrier obstacle, focusing on recent progress using the IN route as a potential avenue for effective neurodegenerative disease therapies. Additionally, we will delve into the preclinical studies that have provided the basis for the clinical trials conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40730695What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.