ArticleScientific reports2025
An artificial intelligence model to predict mortality among hemodialysis patients: A retrospective validated cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Dialysis Therapies:Saudi medical journal · 2026Review
- An interpretable machine learning model for detecting vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy among patients with diabetic retinopathy: a web-based cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- From Logistic Regression to Foundation Models: Factors Associated With Improved Forecasts.Cureus · 2025Review
- Use of machine learning models to predict mortality in dialysis patients.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hemodialysis stands as the most prevalent renal replacement therapy globally. Accurately identifying mortality among hemodialysis patients is paramount importance, as it enables the formulation of tailored interventions and facilitates timely management. The objective of the study was to establish and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict mortality among hemodialysis patients. The data of 559 patients with hemodialysis at a large tertiary hospital were retrospectively analyzed, and those of 82 patients were extracted from another tertiary hospital. The patients from the large tertiary hospital constituted the model development cohort, and the patients from another tertiary hospital constituted the external validation cohort. The patients in the model development cohort were randomly divided into a training cohort and an internal validation cohort at a ratio of 8:2. The machine learning algorithms used to develop the models for the training group included logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), extreme gradient boosting machine (eXGBM), neural network (NN), and support vector machine (SVM). The predictive performances of all the models were evaluated using discrimination and calibration. In addition, a comprehensive scoring system to evaluate the prediction performance of the model was also used, the scoring system had the scores ranging from 0 to 50. The optimal model had the highest total score for the internal and external validation, and was further deployed as an AI application using Streamlit. The rates of mortality at one year, four years, and seven years in the model development group were determined to be 2.68%, 15.38%, and 33.09%, respectively. The model, which predicted mortality at these time points, achieved impressive area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.979 (95% CI: 0.959-0.998), 0.933 (95% CI: 0.916-0.958), and 0.935 (95% CI: 0.895-0.976), respectively, using the eXGBM model. The corresponding accuracies were 0.931, 0.889, and 0.931, with precision values of 0.891, 0.857, and 0.891, and brier scores of 0.051, 0.096, and 0.051, respectively. Notably, the eXGBM model outperformed other models with a score of 46 in the comprehensive scoring system, followed by the NN model with a score of 35. External validation further confirmed the robust predictive performance of the eXGBM model, with an AUC value of 0.892 (95% CI: 0.840-0.945). The eXGBM model emerged as the most reliable predictor of mortality among hemodialysis patients in this study. This model has been made available online at https://mortality-among-hemodialysis-bpypyb4dxvq4hja29kwsev.streamlit.app/ . Users can simply access the link, input relevant features, and receive predictions on mortality risk. Furthermore, the AI model provides insights into how the predictions were generated and offers personalized recommendations for intervention strategies. This study has successfully developed and validated an AI application for assessing mortality risk in hemodialysis patients. This tool empowers healthcare professionals to promptly identify individuals at high risk of mortality, thereby aiding in clinical decision-making and intervention planning. For patients at high risk of early death, caution is advised when considering kidney transplant surgery. Conversely, for those with a high probability of extended survival, kidney transplant surgery may present a favorable treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.