Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40732104›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2025

Preventing Microorganism Contamination in Starting Active Materials for Synthesis from Global Regulatory Agencies: Overview for Public Health Implications.

Francesco Gravante, Francesco Sacchini, Stefano Mancin, Diego Lopane, Mauro Parozzi, Gaetano Ferrara, Marco Sguanci, Sara Morales Palomares, Federico Biondini, Francesca Marfella and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Francesco GravanteLocal Health Authority of Caserta, San Giuseppe Moscati Hospital, 81031 Aversa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3548-6018
Francesco SacchiniNursing Department Polytechnic, University of Ancona, 60121 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-2768-2571
Stefano MancinIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4988-4391
Diego LopaneIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4822-5001
Mauro ParozziDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43121 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4164-2790
Gaetano FerraraNephrology and Dialysis Unit, Ramazzini Hospital, 41012 Carpi, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-3208-2874
Marco SguanciA.O. Polyclinic San Martino Hospital, 16132 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8845-5127
Sara Morales PalomaresDepartment of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences (DFSSN), University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-3884-4823
Federico BiondiniUnits of Psychiatry, Ast Fermo, 63900 Fermo, Italy.
Francesca MarfellaItalian Coordination Volunteer Nurses of Hemergencies Association (Cives), 00184 Rome, Italy.
Giovanni CangelosiSchool of Pharmacy, Experimental Medicine and "Stefani Scuri" Public Health Department, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8523-6906
Gabriele CaggianelliAzienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata, 00184 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1985-3068
Fabio PetrelliSchool of Pharmacy, Experimental Medicine and "Stefani Scuri" Public Health Department, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Starting Active Materials for Synthesis (SAMS) represents a critical stage in drug manufacturing, directly influencing the microbiological quality and safety of the final product. The introduction of SAMS marks the point where Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) begin to apply, which are essential for ensuring sterility and preventing microbial contamination during the synthesis process. However, defining the exact point in the process that qualifies as the SAMS is subject to uncertainties, as earlier stages are not always governed by stringent GMP standards. The regulatory differences between various countries further contribute to this issue. This study explores the implications of SAMS selection and use in relation to sterility and infection control, analyzing the guidelines of major Regulatory Authorities and comparing their approaches to GMP. Regulations from several international regulatory agencies were examined, with a particular focus on microbiological control measures and infection protection in the SAMS manufacturing process. The analysis focused on the microbiological control requirements and safety measures applicable to the stages preceding the introduction of SAMS into the production of the final Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs). Documents published between 2015 and 2025 were included based on predefined criteria regarding relevance, accessibility, and regulatory authority. The analysis revealed significant discrepancies between regulations regarding the definition and management of SAMS. In particular, the regulations in Mexico and India have notable gaps, failing to provide clear guidelines on SAMS sterility and protection against infectious contamination. Conversely, China has introduced risk-based approaches and early-stage microbiological controls, especially for sterile products, aligning with international standards. The European Medicines Agency (EMA), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S), and the World Health Organization (WHO) have well-established systems for microbiological quality control of SAMS, including rigorous measures for the validation of suppliers and risk management to ensure that SAMS does not compromise the microbiological safety of the final product. The regulations in Brazil and Canada introduce additional measures to protect the microbiological quality of SAMS, with specifications for contamination control and certification of critical stages. The lack of a harmonized language for the definition of SAMS, coupled with a fragmented regulatory framework, presents a challenge for infection protection in pharmaceutical manufacturing. Key issues include the absence of specific regulations for stages prior to the introduction of SAMS and the lack of standards for inspections related to these stages. A desirable solution would be the mandatory extension of GMPs to the stages before SAMS introduction, with centralized control to ensure sterility and protection against infection throughout the entire manufacturing process.

Indexed as

global regulatory agenciesoverviewpreventing microorganism contaminationpublic healthstarting active materials for synthesis

Identifiers

PMID40732104
PMCPMC12298561

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.