ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Targeted Biologic Therapies in Severe Asthma: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Clinical Applications.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Immune and inflammatory mechanisms in asthma: insights into epigenetic modifications.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Emerging Targeted Therapies in Asthma: From Upstream Epithelial Biology to Novel Biologic and Small-Molecule Strategies.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2026Review
- Effectiveness and Safety of Budesonide/Formoterol in Asthma: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Reprogramming Inflammatory Macrophages with Specialized Pro-Resolving Lipid Mediators: A Novel Immunotherapeutic Strategy for Asthma.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Systematic druggable genome-wide mendelian randomization identifies therapeutic targets for childhood asthma.Medicine · 2025Article
- Recent Developments in Monoclonal-Antibody-Based Biologic Therapy for Severe Refractory Eosinophilic Asthma.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Fibrotic Disease of the Skin and Lung: Shared Pathways, Environmental Drivers, and Therapeutic Opportunities in a Changing Climate.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asthma represents a heterogeneous disorder characterized by a dynamic balance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory forces, with allergic sensitization contributing substantially to airway hyperresponsiveness and remodeling. Central to its pathogenesis are cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-17, and IL-33, which drive recruitment of eosinophils, neutrophils, and other effector cells, thereby precipitating episodic exacerbations in response to viral and environmental triggers. Conventional biomarkers, including blood and sputum eosinophil counts, IgE levels, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide, facilitate phenotypic classification and guide the emerging biologic era. Monoclonal antibodies targeting IgE (omalizumab) and IL-5 (mepolizumab, benralizumab, reslizumab, depemokimab) have demonstrated the ability to reduce exacerbation frequency and improve lung function, with newer agents such as depemokimab offering extended dosing intervals. Itepekimab, an anti-IL-33 antibody, effectively engages its target and mitigates tissue eosinophilia, while CM310-stapokibart, tralokinumab, and lebrikizumab inhibit IL-4/IL-13 signaling with variable efficacy depending on patient biomarkers. Comparative analyses of these biologics, encompassing affinity, dosing regimens, and trial outcomes, underscore the imperative of personalized therapy to optimize disease control in severe asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.