ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Poisonous Plant Prediction Using Explainable Deep Inherent Learning Model.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing global discovery of plant species presents both opportunities and challenges, particularly in distinguishing between beneficial and poisonous varieties. While computer vision techniques show promise for classifying plant species and predicting toxicity, the lack of comprehensive datasets including images, scientific names, descriptions, local names, and poisonous status complicates these predictions. In this paper, we propose an Explainable Deep Inherent Learning approach that leverages advanced computer vision techniques for effective plant species classification and poisonous status prediction. The proposed Deep Inherent Learning method was validated using different explanation techniques, and Explainable AI (XAI) was employed to clarify decision-making processes at both the local and global levels. Additionally, we provide visual information to enhance trust in the proposed method. To validate the efficacy of our approach, we present a case study involving 2500 images of 50 different plant species from the Arabian Peninsula, enriched with essential metadata. This research aims to reduce the incidence of poisoning from harmful plants, thereby benefiting individuals and society. Our experimental results demonstrate strong performance, with the XAI model achieving accuracy, Precision, Recall, and F1-Score of 0.94, 0.96, 0.96 and 0.97, respectively. By enhancing interpretability, our study fosters greater trust in AI-driven plant classification systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.