Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40732564›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Comprehensive Review on Sensor-Based Electronic Nose for Food Quality and Safety.

Teodora Sanislav, George D Mois, Sherali Zeadally, Silviu Folea, Tudor C Radoni, Ebtesam A Al-Suhaimi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Artificial Intelligence in Rhinology: A State-of-the-Art Review of Clinical Readiness and Implementation Pathways.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Teodora SanislavAutomation Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3019-004X
George D MoisAutomation Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6199-5289
Sherali ZeadallyCollege of Communication and Information, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0224, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5982-8190
Silviu FoleaAutomation Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1873-9597
Tudor C RadoniAutomation Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ebtesam A Al-SuhaimiVice Presidency for Scientific Research and Innovation, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-1614-0211

Funding

Technical University of Cluj-Napoca GNaC ARUT 2023 Program, 4/01.07.2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food quality and safety are essential for ensuring public health, preventing foodborne illness, reducing food waste, maintaining consumer confidence, and supporting regulatory compliance and international trade. This has led to the emergence of many research works that focus on automating and streamlining the assessment of food quality. Electronic noses have become of paramount importance in this context. We analyze the current state of research in the development of electronic noses for food quality and safety. We examined research papers published in three different scientific databases in the last decade, leading to a comprehensive review of the field. Our review found that most of the efforts use portable, low-cost electronic noses, coupled with pattern recognition algorithms, for evaluating the quality levels in certain well-defined food classes, reaching accuracies exceeding 90% in most cases. Despite these encouraging results, key challenges remain, particularly in diversifying the sensor response across complex substances, improving odor differentiation, compensating for sensor drift, and ensuring real-world reliability. These limitations indicate that a complete device mimicking the flexibility and selectivity of the human olfactory system is not yet available. To address these gaps, our review recommends solutions such as the adoption of adaptive machine learning models to reduce calibration needs and enhance drift resilience and the implementation of standardized protocols for data acquisition and model validation. We introduce benchmark comparisons and a future roadmap for electronic noses that demonstrate their potential to evolve from controlled studies to scalable industrial applications. In doing so, this review aims not only to assess the state of the field but also to support its transition toward more robust, interpretable, and field-ready electronic nose technologies.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesElectronic NoseFood QualityFood SafetyAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningOdorantsartificial olfactionelectronic nosefood qualityfood safetypattern recognition

Identifiers

PMID40732564
PMCPMC12301011

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.