ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Opportunities and Limitations of Wrist-Worn Devices for Dyskinesia Detection in Parkinson's Disease.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Prototype to Clinical Workflow: Co-Developing a Wearable Hypomimia System for Parkinson's Disease.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Assessing the Generalizability of Foundation Models for the Recognition of Motor Examinations in Parkinson's Disease.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the in-hospital optimization of dopaminergic dosage for Parkinson's disease, drug-induced dyskinesias emerge as a common side effect. Wrist-worn devices present a substantial opportunity for continuous movement recording and the supportive identification of these dyskinesias. To bridge the gap between dyskinesia assessment and machine learning-enabled detection, the recorded information requires meaningful data representations. This study evaluates and compares two distinct representations of sensor data: a task-dependent, semantically grounded approach and automatically extracted large-scale time-series features. Each representation was assessed on public datasets to identify the best-performing machine learning model and subsequently applied to our own collected dataset to assess generalizability. Data representations incorporating semantic knowledge demonstrated comparable or superior performance to reported works, with peak F
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.