ReviewNutrients2025
Hydration Meets Regulation: Insights into Bicarbonate Mineral Water and Acid-Base Balance.
Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The health benefits of alkaline water: is it a fact or marketing myth?Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The gut-kidney axis in calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis: Nutritional and microbial insights.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2026Review
- Review
- Beyond Thirst: Influence of Bicarbonate Mineral Water on Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Gastrointestinal Function, and Liver Health.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- Controlled Fabrication of pH-Visualised Silk Fibroin-Sericin Dual-Network Hydrogels for Urine Detection in Diapers.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acid-base balance is critical to human health and can be significantly influenced by dietary choices. The Western diet, characterized by high meat and cheese consumption, induces excess acidity, highlighting the need for strategies to mitigate this. Recent studies have focused on bicarbonate-rich mineral water as a viable solution. In this context, the present narrative review synthesizes the findings from recent scientific studies on bicarbonate-rich mineral water, specifically those with bicarbonate levels over 1300 mg/L and medium or low PRAL values. This water has been shown to exert beneficial effects on both urinary and blood parameters. The key effects include an increase in the urine pH and a profound reduction in net acid excretion as a sign for a reduced acid load. Additionally, bicarbonate mineral water has been shown to decrease the excretion of nephrolithiasis-related constituents, including calcium and oxalates, as well as inhibitory substances such as magnesium and citrates. In blood, bicarbonate-rich water has been demonstrated to stabilize pH and increase bicarbonate levels, thereby enhancing systemic buffering capacity. Clinically, these changes have been associated with a lowered risk of calcium oxalate stone formation and improved kidney health. Furthermore, bicarbonate-rich water has been shown to support bone health by reducing bone resorption markers. Consequently, the integration of bicarbonate-rich mineral water into the diet has the potential to enhance urinary and blood parameters, mitigate the risk of kidney stones, and strengthen skeletal integrity, thereby serving as a promising strategy for health promotion and disease prevention. While promising, these findings underscore the need for further research to establish long-term recommendations. Future interventional studies should be designed with rigorous randomization, larger sample sizes, cross-over methodologies, and comprehensive dietary assessments to address the methodological limitations of previous research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.