ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Probiotics in Nanotechnology-Driven Wound Healing: From Mechanistic Insight to Clinical Promise.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic insights into probiotic modulation of the gut-immune axis and their role as sustainable antibiotic alternatives in poultry production: An integrative review.Veterinary world · 2026Article
- Nanobiotic-Enhanced Probiotics for Targeted Gut Delivery: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Applications, and Translational Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Potential and Challenges ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The emerging role of probiotics in the management and treatment of diabetic foot ulcer: a comprehensive review.AIMS microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic wounds, including diabetic foot ulcers and pressure sores, are becoming more prevalent due to aging populations and increased metabolic problems. These wounds often persist due to impaired healing, chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens, making conventional treatments-including antibiotics and antiseptics-largely inadequate. This creates an urgent need for advanced, biologically responsive therapies that can both combat infection and promote tissue regeneration. Probiotics have surfaced as a viable option owing to their capacity to regulate immune responses, impede pathogenic biofilms, and generate antibacterial and antioxidant metabolites. However, their clinical application is limited by poor viability, sensitivity to environmental conditions, and short retention at wound sites. Nanotechnology-based delivery systems address these limitations by protecting probiotics from degradation, enhancing site-specific delivery, and enabling controlled, stimuli-responsive release. Encapsulation techniques using materials like chitosan, PLGA, liposomes, nanogels, nanofibers, and microneedles have shown significant success in improving wound healing outcomes in preclinical and clinical models. This review summarizes the current landscape of chronic wound challenges and presents recent advances in probiotic-loaded nanotechnologies. It explores various nano-delivery systems, their mechanisms of action, biological effects, and therapeutic outcomes, highlighting the synergy between probiotics and nanocarriers as a novel, multifaceted strategy for managing chronic wounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.