Microwave-Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Coupled with Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent Enables High-Yield, Low-Solvent Recovery of Curcumin from

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Liposomes, Niosomes, Ethosomes, and Transethosomes for Curcumin and Chlorogenic Acid Delivery: Formulation Design and Dermal Performance.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Review
2. A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances in Sustainable Synthesis of Bio-Based Furanic Compounds Via Chemical, Biological, Chemobiological and Other Combination Approach in Benign Systems.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026
   Review
3. Advances in Food Processing Techniques for Allergenicity Reduction and Allergen Identification.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as