ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Phage Therapy in Managing Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Infections in Cancer Therapy: Innovations, Complications, and Future Directions.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunoinformatics-driven multi-epitope vaccine design as a promising strategy against multidrug-resistant pathogens: a comprehensive review.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Review
- Bacteriophage therapy for multidrug-resistant bacterial infections: recent advances, clinical evidence, and translational challenges.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Veterinary Bacterial Pathogens: Resistance Patterns, Zoonotic Risks and One Health Implications.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Reimagining Phage Therapy for MDR Pathogens: From Biobanks to Health System Integration-A Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Review
- Genomic and functional characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Phage therapy and the microbiome in hematologic malignancies: opportunities, mechanisms, and early evidence.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections present a major challenge in cancer therapy, particularly for immunocompromised patients undergoing chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery. These infections often arise from prolonged antibiotic use, hospital-acquired pathogens, and weakened immune defenses, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. As conventional antibiotics become less effective against MDR strains, there is an urgent need for alternative treatment options. This review highlights phage therapy as a promising approach to managing MDR bacterial infections in cancer patients. Once widely used, phage therapy has recently regained attention as a targeted antimicrobial strategy that can specifically eliminate harmful bacteria while preserving the beneficial microbiota. Phages work by directly lysing bacteria, disrupting biofilms, and synergizing with antibiotics to restore bacterial susceptibility. These mechanisms make phage therapy especially appealing for treating infections that complicate cancer treatments. However, the clinical application of phage therapy faces challenges such as variability in phage-host interactions, regulatory hurdles, and immune responses in patients. This review identifies gaps in current research regarding the use of phage therapy for MDR infections in cancer patients. By examining recent innovations, therapeutic mechanisms, and associated limitations, we provide valuable insights into the potential of phage therapy for improving infection management in oncology. Future research should focus on refining phage delivery methods, assessing long-term safety, and exploring combination therapies to maximize clinical efficacy. Overcoming these challenges could position phage therapy as a valuable complement to existing antimicrobial strategies in cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.