ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Inhalable Nanotechnology-Based Drug Delivery Systems for the Treatment of Inflammatory Lung Diseases.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulmonary Drug Delivery in the Era of Nanomedicine: From Biological Barriers to Artificial Intelligence-Driven Optimization.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Engineering Resatorvid-Loaded Sub-Microgels of Epigallocatechin-3-gallate/Hyaluronic Acid to Treat Acute Lung Injury.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Navigating theNanoscale advances · 2026Review
- Macrophage membrane-biomimetic bimetallic manganese-platinum nanozymes ameliorate intrapulmonary oxidative stress and inflammation in experimental COPD.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- NLRP3 inflammasomes at the ARDS-cancer interface: mechanisms and translational hypotheses.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Targeting Multiple Pathophysiological Axes in COPD: Nanomaterial Advances.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review explores recent advancements in inhaled nanoparticle formulations and inhalation devices, with a focus on various types of nanoparticles used for inhalation to treat inflammatory lung diseases and the types of devices used in their delivery. Medical nebulizers have been found to be the most appropriate type of inhalation devices for the pulmonary delivery of nanoparticles, since formulations can be prepared using straightforward techniques, with no need for liquefied propellants as in the case of pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), or complicated preparation procedures as in the case of dry powder inhalers (DPIs). We demonstrated examples of how formulations should be designed considering the operation mechanism of nebulizers, and how an interplay of factors can affect the aerosol characteristics of nanoparticle formulations. Overall, nanoparticle-based formulations offer promising potential for the treatment of inflammatory lung diseases due to their unique physicochemical properties and ability to provide localized drug delivery in the lung following inhalation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.