ReviewViruses2025
A Beautiful Bind: Phage Display and the Search for Cell-Selective Peptides.
Review in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cyclic Peptides as Modulators of Protein-Protein Interactions: A Survival Guide from Discovery Platforms to AI-Driven Design.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Linker Engineering in Stapled Peptides for Enhanced Membrane Permeability: Screening and Optimization Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Identification and Expression of Immunogenic Mimotopes ofVaccines · 2026Article
- PhIP-Seq: unveiling the complexity of antibody repertoires in health and disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phage display has advanced the discovery of peptides that selectively bind to a wide variety of cell surface molecules, offering new modalities to modulate disease-related protein-protein interactions (PPIs). These cell-binding peptides occupy a unique pharmaceutical space between small molecules and large biologics, and their growing popularity has opened up new avenues for targeting cell surface proteins that were previously considered undruggable. This work provides an overview of methods for identifying cell-selective peptides using phage display combinatorial libraries, covering in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo biopanning approaches. It addresses key considerations in library design, including the peptide conformation (linear vs. cyclic) and length, and highlights examples of clinically approved peptides developed through phage display. It also discusses the on-phage chemical cyclization of peptides to overcome the limitations of genetically encoded disulfide bridges and emphasizes advances in combining next-generation sequencing (NGS) with phage display to improve peptide selection and analysis workflows. Furthermore, due to the often suboptimal binding affinity of peptides identified in phage display selections, this article discusses affinity maturation techniques, including random mutagenesis and rational design through structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies to optimize initial peptide candidates. By integrating these developments, this review outlines practical strategies and future directions for harnessing phage display in targeting challenging cell surface proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.