ReviewVaccines2025
The Impact of Animal Models and Strain Standardization on the Evaluation of Tuberculosis Vaccine Efficacy.
Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart nanoparticle vaccines integrate nanotechnology artificial intelligence and immunoengineering for precision immunization.Discover nano · 2026Review
- BCG vaccination reduces the rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis dissemination between murine lungs.Research square · 2026Article
- BCG vaccination reduces the rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis dissemination between murine lungs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A Rapid Active-Latent-Relapse Murine Model of Tuberculosis Based Blood Transcriptional Signature That Distinguishes Disease Stages.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Obesity and Natural Products: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Potential, and Future Directions.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Prophylactic and post-exposure efficacy of a Pichinde virus vector-based tuberculosis vaccine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Alterations in the Immune Response in Individuals with Latent Tuberculosis Infection.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the most significant challenges to global public health. Vaccine development is a critical strategy for the prevention and control of TB. However, evaluating the protective efficacy of TB vaccines faces numerous challenges, particularly in the selection of animal models and bacterial strains. Variations in animal models, challenge strains, challenge routes, and doses can significantly impact the outcomes of preclinical evaluations. This article highlights the importance of standardizing preclinical evaluation models, summarizes the animal models and challenge strains used in novel TB vaccine candidates, efficacy studies, and discusses the advantages and limitations of commonly used animal models in TB vaccine research. It also points out the differential performance of various animal models in simulating protection and pathology. Given the current limitations of using a narrow range of challenge strains and the lack of standardized infection routes and doses, this article calls for the establishment of more standardized challenge strains and the development of standardized evaluation models to improve the reliability and generalizability of new TB vaccine efficacy assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.