ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2025
Combustion products of burn pit constituents induce more changes in asthmatic than non-asthmatic murine lungs.
Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBurn pits, a method for disposal of military waste outside the United States, produce toxic substances, to which 3.5 million military personnel have been and continue to be exposed. Mild asthma (persistent or intermittent symptoms of asthma but no change in pulmonary function tests) is found among military personnel. We investigated whether burn pit combustion products (CPs) are more detrimental to the airways of asthmatic than non-asthmatic mice.
methodsMice were exposed to house dust mite antigen (HDM) or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) 5 times over 2 weeks to initiate asthma-like airway injury. Condensates of CPs or saline were generated by flaming combustion of military cardboard, plastic and military plywood. CPs were aspirated oropharyngeally at 24 h after the final HDM or PBS instillation. The lungs were studied 24 h later.
resultsHDM increased recruitment of eosinophils and mucus projection, both Muc5ac and Muc5b mRNAs and protein. Following exposure to CPs, mice exposed to HDM had a greater inflammatory response and injury, as measured by increased neutrophil recruitment and the concentration of protein in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), than control mice exposed to PBS. Expression of neutrophil chemokines was enhanced. CPs had no effect on HDM-induced eosinophil recruitment or expression of Th2 cytokines. CPs had no effect on mucus production in PBS or HDM mice. However, CPs increased intraluminal mucus, as revealed by AB-PAS staining, only in HDM mice, suggesting that CPs impaired mucociliary clearance (MCC), the lung's primary defense system, only in asthmatic airways. Lung RNA sequencing revealed that CPs increased genes and gene pathways describing inflammatory processes and impaired structure and function of cilia to a greater degree in HDM mice.
conclusionsThese data indicate that asthmatic mice are more susceptible to CP-induced lung remodeling and dysfunction than non-asthmatic mice. Enhanced chemokine expression suggests that the CXCL1,2,5/CXCR2 axis may be the mechanism of the increased neutrophil recruitment. A potential mechanism of mucus accumulation is that inhalation of CPs amplifies the changes in cilia and MCC caused by asthma and triggers a positive feedback loop of enhanced inflammation induced by this accumulating mucus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.