Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40734666›Full record

ArticlePhotoacoustics2025

Artifacts in photoacoustic imaging: Origins and mitigations.

Max T Rietberg, Janek Gröhl, Thomas R Else, Sarah E Bohndiek, Srirang Manohar, Benjamin T Cox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photoacoustics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Max T RietbergMulti-Modality Medical Imaging, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522 NB, Overijssel, The Netherlands.
Janek GröhlCancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.
Thomas R ElseCancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.
Sarah E BohndiekCancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.
Srirang ManoharMulti-Modality Medical Imaging, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522 NB, Overijssel, The Netherlands.
Benjamin T CoxDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, Gower St, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photoacoustic imaging (PAI) is rapidly moving from the laboratory to the clinic, increasing the need to understand confounders which might adversely affect patient care. Over the past five years, landmark studies have shown the clinical utility of PAI, leading to regulatory approval of several devices. In this article, we describe the various causes of artifacts in PAI, providing schematic overviews and practical examples, simulated as well as experimental. This work serves two purposes: (1) educating clinical users to identify artifacts, understand their causes, and assess their impact, and (2) providing a reference of the limitations of current systems for those working to improve them. We explain how two aspects of PAI systems lead to artifacts: their inability to measure complete data sets, and embedded assumptions during reconstruction. We describe the physics underlying PAI, and propose a classification of the artifacts. The paper concludes by discussing possible advanced mitigation strategies.

Indexed as

Imaging artifactsMedical imagingMolecular imagingRadiologyReview

Identifiers

PMID40734666
PMCPMC12305209

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.