ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
The feasibility and efficacy of coach-led virtual home-based cycling among individuals with cerebral palsy.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cerebral palsy (CP) is a neurological disorder that impairs motor control and coordination, often leading to physical and social restrictions in daily activities. This single-arm feasibility study investigates the potential efficacy of virtual moderate- to high-intensity cycling at home among individuals with CP. Methods: Twenty-three individuals with CP ( Results: The intervention was demonstrated to be safe and feasible, with no adverse events reported. Retention was high, with only one dropout attributed to mononucleosis. The remaining 22 participants completed the study with a high attendance averaging 3.1 sessions/week [range 2-5]. Improvements were observed in the FTP test (67.2 ± 37.3 W, Discussion: Our findings suggest that virtual cycling at home is a safe and feasible approach to engage in moderate- to high-intensity exercise, enhance physical capacity, and improve functional activity outcomes for individuals with activity limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.