ArticleBMJ public health2025
What are community perspectives and experiences around GLP-1 receptor agonist medications for weight loss? A cross-sectional survey study in the UK.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment Patterns and Experienced Effects of Semaglutide for Weight Management Among Adult Users in Denmark: A Community Pharmacy-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Redefining weight management after liver transplantation with glucagon-like peptide one and gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor agonists.World journal of transplantation · 2026Review
- GLP-1 receptor agonists and the emergence of treatment-related stigma: a call for conceptual clarity.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Review
- Perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of GLP-1 receptor agonists for weight management in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional survey study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Readability of AI-Generated Patient Information on Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Pre-Treatment Concerns and Their Association With Functioning and Well-Being During Incretin-Based Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- A comprehensive analysis of community pharmacists' practices, barriers, and strategies in patient education on Saxenda®: a qualitative study.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Article
- Considering Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RAs) for Weight Loss: Insights from a Pragmatic Mixed-Methods Study of Patient Beliefs and Barriers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Understanding obesity treatment choices: a mixed-methods study of patient preferences and shared decision-making.Translational behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, information sources, and use of weight-loss injections among adults in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Large Language Model Responses Versus Internet Searches for Common Questions About Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy: Exploratory Simulation Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Article
- Beyond the prescription: Global observations on the social implications of GLP-1 receptor agonists for weight loss.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Obesity is a critical public health challenge globally. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have demonstrated significant efficacy in weight loss; however, their adoption is influenced by various individual and societal factors. This study sought to examine awareness, motivations and barriers to adoption of GLP-1RAs in the UK, with a focus on demographic differences. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 1297 UK adults was conducted using an electronic questionnaire distributed via social media, online platforms and personal networks. The survey assessed demographic characteristics, awareness, perceptions and use of GLP-1RAs. Data were analysed using χ2 and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The primary analysis method was ordinal logistic regression, with multinomial logistic regression used to estimate the relative risk ratio (RRR) if the proportional odds assumption was violated. A p-value<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Significantly higher awareness of GLP-1RAs was observed among those attempting weight loss in the past year (85.7% vs 14.3%, p<0.001). Women were more likely to report both awareness (87.2% vs 68.2%, p<0.001) and excellent understanding (20.0% vs 7.5%, p<0.001). Main information sources included news (60.1%) and social media (50.3%). Only 9.0% first learnt about GLP-1RAs from healthcare providers. Past and current users were less likely than non-users to express scepticism about safety and efficacy and 6.91 times more likely to strongly disagree (compared with being neutral) that 'risks outweigh the benefits' (RRR, 6.91; 95% CI, 4.32 to 11.05; p<0.001) and 7.33 times more likely to strongly disagree (relative to being neutral) that 'there is not enough evidence to suggest GLP-1RAs are safe' (RRR, 7.33; 95% CI, 4.05 to 13.27; p<0.001). 91.0% of current or past users indicated they would recommend GLP-1RAs to a friend struggling with weight management. Conclusion: Concerns about safety, cost and potential side effects remain significant barriers to GLP-1RA adoption. Current or past users strongly disagree with statements of scepticism; however, scepticism among non-users highlights the need for improved public education around safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.