Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40734969›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2025

What are community perspectives and experiences around GLP-1 receptor agonist medications for weight loss? A cross-sectional survey study in the UK.

Nadja Auerbach, Vivian N Liu, David Roy Huang, Ashley Kieran Clift, Mahmoud Al-Ammouri, Austen El-Osta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nadja AuerbachMenwell Ltd, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8583-0792
Vivian N LiuMenwell Ltd, London, UK.
David Roy HuangMenwell Ltd, London, UK.
Ashley Kieran CliftMenwell Ltd, London, UK.
Mahmoud Al-AmmouriSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.
Austen El-OstaSelf-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity is a critical public health challenge globally. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have demonstrated significant efficacy in weight loss; however, their adoption is influenced by various individual and societal factors. This study sought to examine awareness, motivations and barriers to adoption of GLP-1RAs in the UK, with a focus on demographic differences. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 1297 UK adults was conducted using an electronic questionnaire distributed via social media, online platforms and personal networks. The survey assessed demographic characteristics, awareness, perceptions and use of GLP-1RAs. Data were analysed using χ2 and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The primary analysis method was ordinal logistic regression, with multinomial logistic regression used to estimate the relative risk ratio (RRR) if the proportional odds assumption was violated. A p-value<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Significantly higher awareness of GLP-1RAs was observed among those attempting weight loss in the past year (85.7% vs 14.3%, p<0.001). Women were more likely to report both awareness (87.2% vs 68.2%, p<0.001) and excellent understanding (20.0% vs 7.5%, p<0.001). Main information sources included news (60.1%) and social media (50.3%). Only 9.0% first learnt about GLP-1RAs from healthcare providers. Past and current users were less likely than non-users to express scepticism about safety and efficacy and 6.91 times more likely to strongly disagree (compared with being neutral) that 'risks outweigh the benefits' (RRR, 6.91; 95% CI, 4.32 to 11.05; p<0.001) and 7.33 times more likely to strongly disagree (relative to being neutral) that 'there is not enough evidence to suggest GLP-1RAs are safe' (RRR, 7.33; 95% CI, 4.05 to 13.27; p<0.001). 91.0% of current or past users indicated they would recommend GLP-1RAs to a friend struggling with weight management. Conclusion: Concerns about safety, cost and potential side effects remain significant barriers to GLP-1RA adoption. Current or past users strongly disagree with statements of scepticism; however, scepticism among non-users highlights the need for improved public education around safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexCommunity HealthCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID40734969
PMCPMC12306312

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.