Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40735149›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroergonomics2025

Neuro-insights: a systematic review of neuromarketing perspectives across consumer buying stages.

Raveena Gupta, Anuj Pal Kapoor, Harsh V Verma

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroergonomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raveena GuptaFaculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Anuj Pal KapoorSchool of Management and Entrepreneurship, Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Harsh V VermaFaculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of neurophysiological techniques in marketing and consumer research has seen substantial growth in recent years. This review provides a comprehensive overview of how neuroscience has been integrated into consumer behavior research commonly referred to as "neuromarketing." While prior reviews have addressed methods, tools, and theoretical foundations, they have largely concentrated on the pre-purchase stage of decision-making. Expanding on this, the current review examines the stage specific affective behavioral and cognitive components neural responses across the full consumer journey. Using the PRISMA framework, the authors systematically analyze stage specific existing neuromarketing literature to present a well-rounded perspective. Moreover, it introduces an integrated framework that aligns neuromarketing insights with each stage of the consumer decision-making process. To support future research, the paper proposes a novel 3 × 3 typology, identifying cross modal interactiona and underexplored areas and gaps in the literature. Overall, this review advances neuromarketing as a rigorous and credible research approach, offering valuable direction for scholars and contributing to its establishment as a recognized discipline within marketing.

Indexed as

consumer buying and decision making processconsumer neuroscienceneuromarketingneuroscientific toolssystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID40735149
PMCPMC12305819

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.