ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a task-sharing mental health intervention for Sickle Cell Disease populations in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: People living with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) experience higher rates of common mental disorders (CMD). There is an alarming treatment gap in the provision of adequate mental health services for CMDs in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). One solution is the implementation of task-sharing interventions such as the Friendship Bench which utilizes concepts of problem-solving therapy (PST). This investigation uses a qualitative study design to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of implementing a PST-based task-sharing mental health intervention for SCD populations in LMICs using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Methods: Purposive, convenience, and snowball sampling strategies were utilized to identify study participants targeting two key groups: (1) SCD stakeholders and (2) global mental health (GMH) experts. Key informant interviews were conducted between July-September 2024. A framework analysis approach was used by iterative deductive and inductive coding. Results were analyzed and synthesized into key themes and patterns, stratified by participant type to highlight variations across stakeholder perspectives. Results: A total of 16 participants completed key informant interviews: 10 (62.5%) were SCD stakeholders and 6 (37.5%) were GMH experts. The geographic scope of work spans 12 countries, with 9 (75.0%) located in sub-Saharan Africa. Both SCD stakeholders and GMH experts expressed a shared consensus on the urgent need for mental health care tailored to SCD populations in LMIC settings. Implementing a task-sharing mental health intervention was viewed as acceptable, however, perspectives on its feasibility varied. Identified barriers included the absence of robust health care systems, limited prioritization and funding for mental health, a shortage of trained mental health professionals, and the pervasive stigma surrounding both SCD and mental health conditions. Conversely, facilitators included the potential receptiveness of SCD populations to mental health care delivered by task-sharing providers, the integration of mental health services within SCD clinics to avoid external referrals, and the cultural adaptability of PST-based interventions. Discussion: Challenges associated with implementing task-sharing mental health interventions stem from larger systemic issues within healthcare systems and the integration of care. Task-sharing represents a critical component of the solution, but requires complementary, coordinated efforts to strengthen the health system holistically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.