Evidence mapPaperPMID 40735207Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Barriers and facilitators to implementing a task-sharing mental health intervention for Sickle Cell Disease populations in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

John Patena, Leah Elster, Tania Hameed, Sumedha Kulkarni, Alden Yuanhong Lai, Annika C Sweetland, Joyce Gyamfi, Temitope Ojo, Angela Odoms-Young, Charmaine Royal and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

John PatenaImplementing Sustainable Evidence-Based Interventions Through Engagement (ISEE) Lab, Department of Global and Environmental Health, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Leah ElsterDepartment of Public Health Policy and Management, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Tania HameedImplementing Sustainable Evidence-Based Interventions Through Engagement (ISEE) Lab, Department of Global and Environmental Health, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Sumedha KulkarniImplementing Sustainable Evidence-Based Interventions Through Engagement (ISEE) Lab, Department of Global and Environmental Health, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Alden Yuanhong LaiDepartment of Public Health Policy and Management, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Annika C SweetlandColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons/New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States.
Joyce GyamfiImplementing Sustainable Evidence-Based Interventions Through Engagement (ISEE) Lab, Department of Global and Environmental Health, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.
Temitope OjoLight Institute for Global Health and Transformation, Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Angela Odoms-YoungDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, New York, NY, United States.
Charmaine RoyalDepartments of African & African American Studies, Biology, Global Health, and Family Medicine & Community Health, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Emmanuel PeprahImplementing Sustainable Evidence-Based Interventions Through Engagement (ISEE) Lab, Department of Global and Environmental Health, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People living with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) experience higher rates of common mental disorders (CMD). There is an alarming treatment gap in the provision of adequate mental health services for CMDs in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). One solution is the implementation of task-sharing interventions such as the Friendship Bench which utilizes concepts of problem-solving therapy (PST). This investigation uses a qualitative study design to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of implementing a PST-based task-sharing mental health intervention for SCD populations in LMICs using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Methods: Purposive, convenience, and snowball sampling strategies were utilized to identify study participants targeting two key groups: (1) SCD stakeholders and (2) global mental health (GMH) experts. Key informant interviews were conducted between July-September 2024. A framework analysis approach was used by iterative deductive and inductive coding. Results were analyzed and synthesized into key themes and patterns, stratified by participant type to highlight variations across stakeholder perspectives. Results: A total of 16 participants completed key informant interviews: 10 (62.5%) were SCD stakeholders and 6 (37.5%) were GMH experts. The geographic scope of work spans 12 countries, with 9 (75.0%) located in sub-Saharan Africa. Both SCD stakeholders and GMH experts expressed a shared consensus on the urgent need for mental health care tailored to SCD populations in LMIC settings. Implementing a task-sharing mental health intervention was viewed as acceptable, however, perspectives on its feasibility varied. Identified barriers included the absence of robust health care systems, limited prioritization and funding for mental health, a shortage of trained mental health professionals, and the pervasive stigma surrounding both SCD and mental health conditions. Conversely, facilitators included the potential receptiveness of SCD populations to mental health care delivered by task-sharing providers, the integration of mental health services within SCD clinics to avoid external referrals, and the cultural adaptability of PST-based interventions. Discussion: Challenges associated with implementing task-sharing mental health interventions stem from larger systemic issues within healthcare systems and the integration of care. Task-sharing represents a critical component of the solution, but requires complementary, coordinated efforts to strengthen the health system holistically.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellMental DisordersMental Health ServicesAdultDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansMaleProblem SolvingQualitative ResearchanxietydepressionLMICmental healthSickle Cell Diseasetask-sharing interventions

Identifiers

PMID40735207
PMCPMC12303879

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.